The unseen role of vehicle movements
Evaluating disease transmission pathways in swine farms
By Jason A. Galvis and Gustavo Machado, North Carolina State University
The role of vehicles in spreading diseases between farms is emerging as a crucial but underrecognized pathway for transmitting infectious diseases, particularly affecting the swine industry.
The link between vehicle movements and outbreaks of diseases such as porcine epidemic diarrhea and African swine fever has been established (Adedeji et al., 2022; Boniotti et al., 2018; Cheng and Ward, 2022; Garrido‐Mantilla et al., 2022; Lowe et al., 2014; Nigsch et al., 2013; Yoo et al., 2021), yet the precise risk these movements pose remains unclear.
This uncertainty stems from an absence of information about pathogen viability on vehicle surfaces and the efficacy of cleaning and disinfection to eliminate such pathogens.
This research introduces an innovative approach to reproduce the indirect contact network between farms by vehicle movements (Figure 1). This approach integrates the concept of pathogen stability, which decreases over time with variations in environmental temperatures (Nuanualsuwan et al., 2022). It also accounts for potentially eliminating pathogens through cleaning and disinfection procedures.
Given the unknown efficacy of these cleaning measures, we simulated scenarios with different levels of cleaning effectiveness: 0%, 10%, 50%, 80%, 90% and 100%, activated whenever a vehicle underwent a cleaning process.
To determine the risk of vehicles transmitting infections due to their proximity to farms, we utilized the Perimeter Buffer Area (PBA) data from RABappTM (Machado et al., 2023), defining a farm as being in contact with a vehicle if it entered a specified distance from the PBA.
We analyzed vehicle movements from 823 vehicles affiliated with three swine production companies in two U.S. regions, categorizing these vehicles into six types based on their cargo: humans (crew), pigs-to-farms, pigs-to-markets, feed, undefined and a composite category of all vehicle types (combined-vehicles).
For each category, we constructed a contact network. We assessed the farms within the infection chain, defined as the median number of farms at risk of infection over a year, based on the sequence of vehicle contacts in the network (Figure 1.)
In the first region, the analysis revealed that without effective cleaning (0% efficacy), the combined vehicles could potentially infect up to 2,157 farms through the contacts available in the vehicle contact network, a value comparable to the number of farms in the infection chain of feed transport vehicles (Figure 2).
The infection chain was slightly lower for vehicles transporting pigs to farms (2,089) and to market (1,507) and for undefined vehicles (1,760), with the lowest values observed in crew vehicles (3). However, with cleaning efficacy set at 100%, the number of farms within the infection chain for the combined, feed and undefined vehicle categories was marginally reduced by 1%.
However, this reduction increased to 26% for vehicles moving pigs to farms, 43% for vehicles moving pigs to market, and 66% for crew vehicles. In the second region, where only one type of vehicle category was considered, with 0% cleaning efficacy, undefined vehicles had the potential to infect 437 farms, which decreased by 76% with 100% cleaning efficacy.
The study indicates that, except for crew transport vehicles, all vehicle types analyzed have the potential to spread disease across numerous farms in both studied regions. For feed transport and undefined vehicles in the first region, the impact of increased cleaning efficacy on reducing infection risk was minimal, attributed to the infrequent cleaning events.
Conversely, vehicles transporting pigs to farms or markets showed a substantial decrease in infection risk with improved cleaning efficacy, similar to the results observed with undefined vehicles in the second region. This pattern is likely due to more frequent encounters with cleaning stations, suggesting a greater awareness of the risk of transporting live animals.
Ultimately, the study concludes that even with cleaning and disinfection efficacy at 100%, vehicles remain a significant pathway for disease spread among swine farms. Therefore, additional measures, such as rerouting or increasing cleaning frequency, are necessary to mitigate this indirect transmission pathway.
ReferencesAdedeji, A.J., Atai, R.B., Gyang, H.E., Gambo, P., Habib, M.A., Weka, R., Muwanika, V.B., Masembe, C., Luka, P.D., 2022. Live pig markets are hotspots for spread of African swine fever virus in Nigeria. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. tbed.14483. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14483
Boniotti, M.B., Papetti, A., Bertasio, C., Giacomini, E., Lazzaro, M., Cerioli, M., Faccini, S., Bonilauri, P., Vezzoli, F., Lavazza, A., Alborali, G.L., 2018. Porcine Epidemic Diarrhoea Virus in Italy: Disease spread and the role of transportation. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 65, 1935–1942. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12974
Cheng, J., Ward, M.P., 2022. Risk factors for the spread of African Swine Fever in China: A Systematic Review of Chinese‐language literature. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. tbed.14573. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14573
Galvis, J.A., Machado, G., 2022. The role of vehicle movement in swine disease dissemination: novel method accounting for pathogen stability and vehicle cleaning effectiveness uncertainties. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2212.07466
Garrido‐Mantilla, J., Lara, A., Guardado, E., Lopez, J., Nerem, J., Pizarro, G., Cano, J.P., 2022. Feed or feed transport as a potential route for a porcine epidemic diarrhoea outbreak in a 10,000‐sow breeding herd in Mexico. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 69, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14354
Lowe, J., Gauger, P., Harmon, K., Zhang, J., Connor, J., Yeske, P., Loula, T., Levis, I., Dufresne, L., Main, R., 2014. Role of transportation in spread of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 872–874. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2005.131628
Machado, G., Galvis, J., Freeman, A., Sanchez, F., Mills, K., Fleming, C., Hong, X., 2023. The Rapid Access Biosecurity (RAB) appTM Handbook. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z5WBJ
Nigsch, A., Costard, S., Jones, B.A., Pfeiffer, D.U., Wieland, B., 2013. Stochastic spatio-temporal modelling of African swine fever spread in the European Union during the high risk period. Prev. Vet. Med. 108, 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.11.003
Nuanualsuwan, S., Songkasupa, T., Boonpornprasert, P., Suwankitwat, N., Lohlamoh, W., Nuengjamnong, C., 2022. Persistence of African swine fever virus on porous and non-porous fomites at environmental temperatures. Porc. Health Manag. 8, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-022-00277-8
Yoo, D.S., Kim, Y., Lee, E.S., Lim, J.S., Hong, S.K., Lee, I.S., Jung, C.S., Yoon, H.C., Wee, S.H., Pfeiffer, D.U., Fournié, G., 2021. Transmission Dynamics of African Swine Fever Virus, South Korea, 2019. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, 1909–1918. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2707.204230
Galvis is a postdoctoral researcher and Machado is an assistant professor of population health and pathobiology, both at NC State.